Blog Post #4: Revisions

For my research proposal revisions, I plan to clarify the scope and strengthen the connection between my research questions, methods, and broader social justice framework. I’m going to refine my methods section by explicitly linking the use of autoethnography, literature review, and iterative thematic grouping to my research goal of understanding how HB 261 impacts student belonging at Utah Tech. I also want to expand on the ethical considerations of conducting research under restrictive laws, making my rationale for anonymity and data protection more transparent. Finally, I’ll revise my introduction and significance sections to emphasize how this project not only contributes to scholarship in Technical and Professional Communication but also serves as an act of resistance within higher education systems constrained by anti-DEI legislation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #1 Introduction to a Topic

     In my Master's program, my instructor is requesting that we show an interest in a topic concerning Technical Writing and Digital Rhetoric (TWDR). Thankfully, I am looking to publish an autoethnography concerning my experience performing IRB research with legal restrictions that limit DEI initiatives. In the state of Utah, lawmakers passed H.B. 261, Equal Opportunities Initiatives. Under this bill, lawmakers scrapped DEI initiatives under the guise that it would open opportunities to those justly qualified. However, as proponents of DEI initiatives have reiterated, DEI initiatives do not encourage workplaces to hire unqualified applicants because of their identity markers, but rather, DEI initiatives encourage workplaces to horizontally open their roles to consider diverse applicants who are equally qualified.      In addition to stripping those DEI initiatives, lawmakers have discontinued multicultural support offices such as the Women's Resource Cente...
Read more

Blog Post #2 Research Topic with 7 Tentative Sources

H ow does a researcher under Utah HB 261's restrictions conduct a study that researches DEI topics? This question will allow me to build a replicable framework that can assist and guide other researchers looking to conduct studies that possibly violate their state anti-DEI bill.  Topic Goal Questions Type Methods Research as Resistance: A process of conducting ethical social justice studies under restrictive laws Understand trends from my experience conducting a study How does a researcher under Utah HB 261's restrictions conduct a study that researches DEI topics? This question will allow me to build a replicable framework that can assist and guide other researchers looking to conduct studies that possibly violate their state anti-DEI bill.  Post-Modern Evaluative  Developmental  -Qualitative -Literature Review -Autoethnography 7 Tentative Sources: Bennett, K. C. (2023). How "Well" are We DEI-ing? Applying Technical and Prof...
Read more

Blog #5 Closing Remarks

In producing a sound research design plan proposal, I learned that one needs to be thorough in order for others to understand and replicate your instructions. The most challenging part of this was developing the research design. The first part of this process involved heavy reading to understand and develop a literature review that grounds research in our already established theory. After that, we had to refine our research methods and understand the qualitative and quantitative aspects of what we were proposing. These processes have taught me as a future technical communicator and rhetorician that being thorough in our writing helps us be more understandable to the layman.
Read more